Trade guide, national
Cleaning contractors in the United States
This site publishes 52,578 cleaning contractor records across all fifty states and the District of Columbia, or 1.57 per 10,000 residents. 0 of them publish a business-level licence source for cleaning that a listing can be matched against.
This page is the one place on this site that explains what cleaning work involves, what its credentials are and where to check one. The counts for a particular metro area are on that metro’s own page, and what a licence class means in a particular state is on that state’s page.
The national facts
- Cleaning contractor records
- 52,578Foursquare Open Source Places, release August 11, 2026
- Per 10,000 residents
- 1.57 per 10,000Population 334,914,895, Census Bureau Vintage 2023 population estimates, as of July 1, 2023
- States publishing a licence source for this trade
- 0 of 51State license files, as of September 2, 2026No state in this release publishes a business-level licence source for this trade that a listing can be matched against.
- Most records per resident
- New Hampshire, 2.23 per 10,000Population 1,402,054, Census Bureau Vintage 2023 population estimates, as of July 1, 2023The fewest is Nebraska, at 0.58 per 10,000. Both ends describe where businesses are recorded, not where work is done.
- Employment and pay for this trade
- Not published for this tradeBLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 OEWS, published May 15, 2026No single BLS occupation maps to this trade cleanly enough to print, so no employment or wage figure is shown rather than one built from an occupation that means something else.
- Independent, franchise, corporate
- 50,967 independent, 1,150 franchise brand, 214 corporate owned, 247 awaiting chain reviewFoursquare Open Source Places, release August 11, 2026
What each row counts, and the universe it counts it in, is set out on the methodology page.
What is particular about cleaning work
Cleaning is the trade on this site with the least licensing and the most access: almost no state licenses it as a trade, and the checks that matter are about insurance, employment and what is being sprayed.
There is usually no licence to check
Residential and janitorial cleaning is not a licensed construction trade in the states whose licence files this site reads, so the licensed share on a cleaning hub is shown as not published rather than as a percentage. That is a fact about the source files and about how the trade is regulated, not a statement about any business listed below.
What a company does normally hold is a local business registration and a tax registration, which are not published as a searchable trade credential anywhere. The substitute checks are insurance and employment, below.
Bonded, insured, and employees rather than contractors
Three questions do most of the work here. Does the company carry general liability insurance, for damage to the house. Does it carry workers' compensation coverage, so an injury in your home is its insurer's problem rather than yours. And are the cleaners employees of the company or independent contractors, which decides who is responsible for both of those and for payroll taxes.
A surety bond is often advertised as being bonded. It is a specific and narrow instrument, usually covering theft by an employee, and it is not a substitute for liability insurance. A company that answers all three questions in writing is giving you more than a licence number would in most states.
Because this is work done inside a house, often with a key and often when nobody is home, background screening policy and staff turnover are fair questions and not rude ones.
What is being sprayed, and on what
Cleaning products are chemicals, and a company applying them at commercial strength should be able to say which ones. Products making a public health claim, disinfectants and sanitisers, are registered pesticides with EPA registration numbers and labels stating contact time and ventilation, and using one against its label is the same violation it would be in any other trade.
Mixing is the common failure: chlorine bleach with an ammonia or acid product produces a hazardous gas in an enclosed bathroom. Any company sending people into houses should have a written practice about it, and safety data sheets available for the products they carry.
Surfaces have their own rules. Natural stone, unsealed grout, waxed wood and some engineered surfaces are damaged by ordinary acid or alkaline cleaners, and the damage is not reversible by cleaning it again.
Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Safer Choice and disinfectant labels
One-off, recurring, and specialty are three markets
A recurring house clean, a move-out or post-construction clean, and a specialty service such as carpet, duct or window cleaning are priced and staffed differently even where one company sells all three. The counts on this page pool them, because a business record does not say which of the three it earns its living from.
Every rule stated above links the public page that states it: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Safer Choice and disinfectant labels.
Cleaning state by state
Each state page carries its own licence classes, its number formats and what its rules do to this trade in particular. The record counts below are that state’s whole cleaning universe, the same figure its own page prints.
| State | Records | Per 10,000 | Licensed share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 522 | 1.02 | Not published |
| Alaska | 110 | 1.50 | Not published |
| Arizona | 1,142 | 1.54 | Not published |
| Arkansas | 328 | 1.07 | Not published |
| California | 6,024 | 1.55 | Not published |
| Colorado | 1,166 | 1.98 | Not published |
| Connecticut | 772 | 2.13 | Not published |
| Delaware | 189 | 1.83 | Not published |
| District of Columbia | 101 | 1.49 | Not published |
| Florida | 4,513 | 2.00 | Not published |
| Georgia | 2,152 | 1.95 | Not published |
| Hawaii | 173 | 1.21 | Not published |
| Idaho | 299 | 1.52 | Not published |
| Illinois | 2,237 | 1.78 | Not published |
| Indiana | 924 | 1.35 | Not published |
| Iowa | 370 | 1.15 | Not published |
| Kansas | 370 | 1.26 | Not published |
| Kentucky | 477 | 1.05 | Not published |
| Louisiana | 495 | 1.08 | Not published |
| Maine | 236 | 1.69 | Not published |
| Maryland | 1,097 | 1.78 | Not published |
| Massachusetts | 1,353 | 1.93 | Not published |
| Michigan | 1,872 | 1.87 | Not published |
| Minnesota | 906 | 1.58 | Not published |
| Mississippi | 333 | 1.13 | Not published |
| Missouri | 923 | 1.49 | Not published |
| Montana | 186 | 1.64 | Not published |
| Nebraska | 114 | 0.58 | Not published |
| Nevada | 522 | 1.63 | Not published |
| New Hampshire | 313 | 2.23 | Not published |
| New Jersey | 1,324 | 1.43 | Not published |
| New Mexico | 237 | 1.12 | Not published |
| New York | 2,196 | 1.12 | Not published |
| North Carolina | 2,087 | 1.93 | Not published |
| North Dakota | 118 | 1.51 | Not published |
| Ohio | 1,986 | 1.69 | Not published |
| Oklahoma | 377 | 0.93 | Not published |
| Oregon | 750 | 1.77 | Not published |
| Pennsylvania | 2,093 | 1.61 | Not published |
| Rhode Island | 178 | 1.62 | Not published |
| South Carolina | 814 | 1.51 | Not published |
| South Dakota | 104 | 1.13 | Not published |
| Tennessee | 1,094 | 1.54 | Not published |
| Texas | 4,283 | 1.40 | Not published |
| Utah | 427 | 1.25 | Not published |
| Vermont | 130 | 2.01 | Not published |
| Virginia | 1,396 | 1.60 | Not published |
| Washington | 1,464 | 1.87 | Not published |
| West Virginia | 162 | 0.92 | Not published |
| Wisconsin | 1,040 | 1.76 | Not published |
| Wyoming | 99 | 1.70 | Not published |
Nothing on this page is a rating, an endorsement, or a recommendation, and no figure here describes any individual business. Ordering never depends on payment, claim status, license status, or any commercial relationship, on this page or any other.