Pros on RecordHome-service contractors, from public records

Metro fact page

Landscaping contractors in Salem, OR

The Salem, OR metro area has 132 landscaping contractors, or 3.02 per 10,000 residents.

What landscaping work involves and how it is licensed is written once on the national landscaping page. Oregon publishes no business-level licence source for landscaping, so this page shows no licensed share; the Oregon page says what it does publish.

The facts

Landscaping contractors in this metro
132
Per 10,000 residents
3.02 per 10,000
Records first appearing in the last 12 months
1
Records flagged closed in the last 12 months
1
Licensed share
Not published for this metro
There is no license source for this trade in Oregon. No landscaping record on this page is described one way or the other on the strength of a missing file.
Employment and pay for this trade
Not published for this trade
Independent, franchise, corporate
132 independent, 0 franchise brand, 0 corporate owned, 0 awaiting chain review
Universe quality
0.75% of source records merged as duplicates, 0.76% carry no street address

Sources and dates: Foursquare Open Source Places, release August 11, 2026. Population 436,546, Census Bureau Vintage 2023 population estimates, as of July 1, 2023.

Row definitions: methodology page.

What these numbers say about landscaping in Salem

By record count, landscaping is the second largest of the 11 trades this site counts in Salem, behind other home service and ahead of flooring. That ordering is a property of the source data's categories rather than a judgement about which trade matters most in Salem.

Per resident, Salem sits close to the Oregon rate for landscaping, so the count at the top of this page reads as ordinary for the state.

The independent share of Salem's landscaping records is close to the Oregon figure, so the mix of independent, franchise-brand and corporate-owned records here is ordinary for the state.

Far fewer of Salem's landscaping records are missing a street address than across Oregon.

Oregon publishes no business-level licence source for landscaping that a listing can be matched against, so the licensed share for Salem is shown as not published rather than as zero, and no landscaping record on this page is described one way or the other on the strength of a file that does not exist.

No licence issuance or lapse figure is published for landscaping in Salem, so no churn figure appears on this page rather than a zero standing in for one.

No Bureau of Labor Statistics occupation maps to landscaping cleanly enough to print, so Salem carries no employment or wage figure for this trade rather than one built from an occupation that means something else.

No Salem landscaping record is classified as a franchise brand or a corporate-owned location, so the chain split here is independent records and records still in review.

No Salem landscaping record is waiting on chain review, so the independent, franchise and corporate counts above account for the whole list.

Landscaping records first appearing in Salem and records flagged closed were close to level over the last twelve months, so the file for this trade and metro held its size.

No city inside Salem differs from the metro enough on landscaping to carry a page of its own, so every record here is answered on this page.

Among the 4 Oregon metro areas this site publishes a landscaping page for, Salem is 3rd of 4 by records per resident, around the middle. The field is the metro areas this site publishes a landscaping page for rather than every metro area in Oregon.

Ordered by landscaping records per resident across every metro area this site publishes a landscaping page for, the hubs either side of Salem are Buffalo-Cheektowaga above it and Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin below it.

Landscaping contractors, A to Z

130 publishable contractors. Ordering never depends on payment, claim status, license status, or any commercial relationship.

Other trades in Salem

Pool has fewer than 8 publishable records in Salem, so it is answered on the overview above instead.